<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SCADA Devices on Verizon and Other Wireless Networks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalbond.com/index.php/2010/03/01/scada-devices-on-verizon-and-other-wireless-networks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalbond.com/index.php/2010/03/01/scada-devices-on-verizon-and-other-wireless-networks/</link>
	<description>This Month in Control System Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 08:43:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Digital Bond &#187; Cellular Modem Use Without Risk</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalbond.com/index.php/2010/03/01/scada-devices-on-verizon-and-other-wireless-networks/comment-page-1/#comment-13826</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Bond &#187; Cellular Modem Use Without Risk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 05:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalbond.com/?p=5504#comment-13826</guid>
		<description>[...] blog readers know we have been talking about and tracking the increased use of cellular modems in SCADA systems. These are often accessible from the Internet, almost always accessible by other users with service [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blog readers know we have been talking about and tracking the increased use of cellular modems in SCADA systems. These are often accessible from the Internet, almost always accessible by other users with service [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Bond &#187; Using Verizon Broadband For SCADA</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalbond.com/index.php/2010/03/01/scada-devices-on-verizon-and-other-wireless-networks/comment-page-1/#comment-13056</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Bond &#187; Using Verizon Broadband For SCADA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 01:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalbond.com/?p=5504#comment-13056</guid>
		<description>[...] Yesterday I blogged on the scan results, configuration issues and increasing use of Verizon, AT&amp;T and other carriers&#8217; broadband services for SCADA. Today I&#8217;ll address the question of whether these networks should be used in SCADA systems. Like most security questions, the answer is not yes or no. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yesterday I blogged on the scan results, configuration issues and increasing use of Verizon, AT&amp;T and other carriers&#8217; broadband services for SCADA. Today I&#8217;ll address the question of whether these networks should be used in SCADA systems. Like most security questions, the answer is not yes or no. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harry</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalbond.com/index.php/2010/03/01/scada-devices-on-verizon-and-other-wireless-networks/comment-page-1/#comment-13054</link>
		<dc:creator>harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 14:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalbond.com/?p=5504#comment-13054</guid>
		<description>A few years back when working at a utility company, I found that a &#039;private&#039; GPRS network was not so private.  By sniffing the traffic, it was determined that there were remote hosts with access to our static IPs.  Due to misconfiguration on the carriers side, our mobile devices were exposed.  This was not a SCADA network, but some testing was being done for a SCADA application.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few years back when working at a utility company, I found that a &#8216;private&#8217; GPRS network was not so private.  By sniffing the traffic, it was determined that there were remote hosts with access to our static IPs.  Due to misconfiguration on the carriers side, our mobile devices were exposed.  This was not a SCADA network, but some testing was being done for a SCADA application.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
